Protecting soils to help combat climate change

This piece was posted by Mahara, Agriculture Coordinator of the FAIR programme in Malawi in response to an article in Alertnet.

I am the Agriculture Coordinator of FAIR Programme in Malawi jointly funded by Find Your Feet(UK), Self Help Africa (UK)and Development Fund of Norway.

Zambia is our neighbour so the weather pattern is similar and the effects of climate change have no significant differences.

FAIR Programme activities are similar with what has been raised in your report and I want to agree by giving examples when it comes to creating water-holding soil basins, reducing tilling and planting trees that help fertilize but let me also add use of manure may help the continent’s small farmers cope up with effects of climate change.

The programme has been promoting sustainable agriculture activities that include agroforestry practices,soil and water conservation, use of manure, small scale irrigation, crop diversification etc. but at the time being I will comment on use of manure on maize planted on ridges and in pits.

For the past three years we have been demonstrating use of manure on maize planted on ridges and pits comparing it with maize treated with inorganic fertiliser (Urea & 23: 21:0). Bokash and Liquid manure has been used for Bassal and Top dressing respectively as analysis of the two has shown that they have higher nutrient content and are lesser labour demanding in making.

During a dry spell, maize applied to inorganic fertliser suffered more moisture stress than maize applied to manure. While maize planted in pits seemed to have not suffered at all.

Maize Pit planting is a technology where maize is planted in pits of 30 cm deep, 45cm apart and 55cm between rows. The pits are filled 20l decomposed manure mixed with sub soil. 5 plants are planted per pit. Same pits can be used for four years. Pits act as basins and coupled with manure(holds water like a sponge)the result is more water conserved for crop use. The soil is not disturbed for the next 4 years or more.

Current average yields realized by smallholder farmers in Malawi ranges 1,400- 2400 kg/ ha for open pollinated maize varieties.(Guide to Agriculture Production; 1994).Yet yield results from 2008/09 Trials and demos where manure only was used on ridges were at 3.8 mt/ ha and where pits were used it almost doubled to 5mt/ ha and 3mt/ ha were recorded where fertiliser only was used on ridges of the same maize variety .

Etlida Luhanga from Rumphi district of the northern part of Malawi was one of the farmers that practiced Pit planting last year. She says because of good results more than 10 farmers have followed her in the technology this year.

So let me agree that technologies that will help less disburbing of the soils while conserving more water and adding organic matter to the soil may help farmers adapt to the effects of climate change.

Deliberating costs lives

There have been a couple of disheartening developments this week.
The World Food Summit in Rome represents an opportunity for world leaders to address the growing food security crisis. However it looks likely that leaders will be signing a vague declaration which lacks targets or deadlines for actions to reduce global hunger.

This strikes a familiar tune. Time has apparently run out for securing a legally binding climate deal at Copenhagen. On Sunday Barak Obama backed plans to delay a formal pact on climate change until next year. This will have a serious effect on food security. As UN Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon said in his opening speech at the World Food Summit “there can be no food security without climate security.”

1 in 6 people on the planet are already facing life-threatening hunger. Lack of targets and delayed deadlines could spell disaster for many more people living in developing countries. These aren’t just statistics – these are people’s lives.

Help challenge this situation! Here are a few things you can do. They may not seem significant but they are all a part of a vital wave for change.
• Make sure that the voices of some of the world’s poorest people are heard: Embed/ post/ e-mail a link our video ‘Climate change: Listening to the voices of rural women’
• Participate in The Wave on December 5th.
• Find out where The Age of Stupid is showing near you and go along with all your friends.

Put People First G20 Counter Conference

Put People First G20 Counter Conference
November 7, 10:00 – 17:30
Central Hall Westminster, SW1H 9NH

Put People First

In March, we marched in our tens of thousands to demand the G20 Put People First. Far from putting people first we’ve seen nothing but a tinkering around the margins followed by the return to business as usual.

On Nov 7, as the G20 returns to the UK, the agenda on the table nurses an already failed economic model back to life, whilst looking to stitch up an unjust international climate deal outside the UN process.

They bailed out the banks to the tune of billions, and now the only choice offered is between what cuts are made to pay for it.

Government intervention to create a Green New Deal is slipping off the agenda, and yet strong alliances are forming – for example environmentalists and trade unionists have been standing side by side at Vestas to save the UK’s largest wind turbine factory.

- In the run up to Copenhagen, how do we get a global agreement on climate that truly puts climate justice at its heart?
- How do we respond to the jobs crisis and growing poverty around the world
- How do we ensure the global green new deal the world needs?
- How we do we show that cuts are not the only option, and demonstrate what Putting People First really look like?

This counter-conference will bring together academics, activists, campaigners, unions, policy makers and YOU to share ideas on what the alternatives are to cuts, cuts and more cuts, and how we must organise across our issues, of jobs, justice and climate, to make the alternative the reality.
Register now

‘Feeding Africa’ – Find Your Feet in The Guardian

FYF Director Dan Taylor was asked to write a comment on an article in The Guardian ‘Feeding Africa.Visit the comment for a fascinating debate on the future of agriculture in Africa.

In the Guardian’s editorial (Feeding Africa, 29 July) the suggestion is made that, without improved seed varieties and fertiliser, African agriculture is a lost cause. This cannot go unchallenged. Farming in the UK elicits a peaceful picture of sheep grazing on green pastures, large fields of crops, and tractors. This image is far from the reality of the farms that produce the majority of Africa’s food. The average African farm is less than a hectare, the farmer is normally a woman and her main implement of cultivation is the hand hoe – this situates African agriculture in a very different context.

The editorial cites “subsidised seed and fertiliser” as the reason for Malawi’s farming transformation, “more than doubling productivity in a single year”. More than 25 years of working in rural Africa has taught me that this is an oversimplification of a very complex set of structural constraints and one that lulls us into a false sense of security. The suggestion is that if you get modern seeds and fertiliser to farmers then Africa’s food insecurity is solved. This modernist assumption that the industrial model of agriculture can solve Africa’s problems simply returns us to the failed policies of the 1960s and ignores the deleterious environmental impact of high input agriculture.

This puts Malawi’s “success” story in a different light. Malawi’s over-dependence on maize for national food security is short-sighted. Input subsidies do not target the poorest and the strategy depends on continued donor support, thereby raising questions of affordability in the face of growing fertiliser prices. Since the scheme is subject to state patronage, it breeds farmers’ dependence on the state.

In attributing the success of the Malawian scheme to farming inputs alone, your leader pays insufficient attention to the optimal rainfall that Malawi experienced over the past agricultural seasons. Droughts and floods in Africa have put paid to best intentions; at some time in the future crops will fail again, at great cost to Malawi’s farmers.

The conclusion that “growing more food … is the part that matters most” is unhelpful since it overlooks the question of longer-term sustainability. Hunger is an abomination, but alleviation in the short term is merely food aid in a different form. A permanent solution is required. We need alternatives to monocultures and fossil fuels. My organisation, Find Your Feet, promotes agroecology – agricultural systems that more closely mimic the natural ecosystems that have served African farmers for millennia. These resource-conserving approaches reorient attention from single crops to diversified risk-reducing strategies that mitigate the effects of climatic unpredictability, and return control to Africa’s farmers.

Business as usual is not an option: new solutions to new problems are needed and science and technology must play a role. Agroecology challenges us to acknowledge the perspicacity of Africa’s farmers and resist the inclination to transfer to Africa more of the same old package – the technologies, market freedoms and mindsets – that created the food crisis in the first place.

“The time has come to regenerate ecosystems”

Mount Kenya Declaration on the Global Crisis and Africa’s Responsibility – Statement from the African Biodiversity Network

“The time has come for national governments to prioritise the regeneration of ecosystems, self-reliant communities and diversified local economies over export oriented policies, free trade agreements and the current wave of expansion of the food system.”

From 23 – 31 May 2009, the African Biodiversity Network (ABN) have gathered together near Mount Kenya, 25 organisations from 10 countries that work with farmers and local communities on the issues of biodiversity, food sovereignty, livelihoods, climate change, traditional knowledge, culture and community rights in Africa.

We are deeply aware that the planet is facing multiple interconnected crises which will have an even bigger impact on Africa, even though Africa is not responsible for these crises. On the one hand, there is the stark and devastating impact of the food and financial crises, which will be compounded by the impact of climate change.

We are very concerned about the devastating impact that the food and financial crises and climate change is having on the people of Africa and their environment. People are losing their livelihoods, houses, jobs at an alarming rate and at the same time, farmers, pastoralists and local communities have to cope with unpredictable changes in their environment. We concur with the Indigenous Peoples , that the Earth is no longer in a period of climate change but in a climate crisis.

We are outraged at the financial crisis which was caused by global financial institutions accumulating unimaginable wealth while speculating with ordinary people’s hard-earned savings. This economic meltdown is now pushing many countries over the brink and is adding another estimated 104 million people to the 1 billion permanently hungry people in the world.

We are also aware that the food crisis and recurring famines in Africa are not something new but is caused by basic structural injustices entrenched over decades, now reaching new levels of deprivation because of the speculative trading of food on international markets.

We find the current scale of ”crisis capitalism” intolerable and strongly reject the cynical attempts of corporates that target Africa for further exploitation of the food and climate crises by turning it into economic opportunities rather than trying to solve it.

We see the underlying cause of the crises as the globalisation of the industrial system which inevitably results in the concentration of capital and power in the hands of a few, generating ever growing poverty and ecological destruction resulting in global climate change. Now the same thinking that created these numerous toxic debts is promoting many “False Solutions” that are exacerbating the crises. There is an intensified scramble for Africa’s land and ecological wealth facilitated by governments who continue to be dominated by corporate interests.

We reject these False Solutions which include:

? Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), which, we are told will solve hunger and climate change, but have instead caused widespread contamination of farmers’ crops and our food while increasing the use of pesticides which destroy biodiversity and health. The ultimate aim of GMO companies is control over our seed and thus food system through the patenting of all forms of life. These crops require highly industrialised farming conditions, which release huge amounts of carbon into the atmosphere, thus a major contributing factor to climate change. In spite of this, GMO proponents are now claiming that they can find GMO fixes for both the climate change and the food crisis.

? AGRA – A New Green Revolution is imposed on Africa by a collaborative effort between amongst others, the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations, the World Bank, and agro-industries to replace Africa’s seeds, crops and knowledge with hybrids, GMOs, fertilisers and pesticides. Because this industrial system needs large tracts of land, AGRA is also funding the push to change land tenure systems, privatise land and so facilitating the rapid change of land from community custodianship to just another commodity in the pockets of investors. The sheer amount of money and political influence the Green Revolution push has behind it, is now dominating the debate on agriculture, pushing for stricter intellectual property rights on seeds, weak biosafety legislation, in the process narrowing Africa’s options for food sovereignty both on country and local level.

? Agrofuels (or biofuels) are promoted in Northern countries as the solution to climate change, as providing an alternative to fossil fuels. But they are driving an unprecedented land grab across Africa, and leading to forced evictions, deforestation, and rising food prices. We challenge the myth spread by corporations and corrupt governments that there is plenty of free land, going spare in Africa. We in Africa know of the challenges and conflicts we already face from the competition for land and water. A number of other solutions to climate change are also turning out to be little more than business opportunities, including biochar, carbon trading, geo-engineering.

It is clear that these proposed solutions by corporate interests are based on acquiring large tracts of land and cheap labour for industrial scale production, serving to maintain the lifestyle of societies of over-consumption thereby exacerbating the crises both in the North and the South. All of these developments claim that they bring progress to Africa. But not only will they fail to address hunger and climate change, they will make them worse. These false solutions are cynical attempts by the corporations to reach new markets, and to make a business out of a crisis

ABN’s Position

ABN believes that the solutions to climate change and hunger are the same: healthy resilient communities depend on healthy resilient ecosystems and biodiversity.

We are certain that the role of healthy, biodiverse ecosystems in maintaining a stable climate is critical, and that it is completely underestimated in most predictions and discussions about climate change. When dealing with climate change, we must both reduce carbon emissions and enhance biodiversity as equally important. Healthy soils built up by ecological agriculture and livelihood systems sink carbon as well as having more capacity to hold water in times of drought or flood.

Food sovereignty at local and national level requires locally adapted crop and livestock diversity and land tenure systems that will enable communities to produce and market food in a way that really feeds people, promote equity and at the same time deal with climate instability.

We also believe that local and indigenous ecological knowledge and governance systems must be urgently revived and enhanced to maximise Africa’s capacity to read, anticipate and adapt to climate change.

The time has come for national governments to prioritise the regeneration of ecosystems, self-reliant communities and diversified local economies over export oriented policies, free trade agreements and the current wave of expansion of the food system.

Africa needs to have the courage to free itself from its colonial legacy and build on its rich heritage through reviving the wisdom of its people as a responsibility to past and future generations. Based on this wealth, it has the capacity to take a lead in finding true solutions by disengaging from the very thinking that has created the crises in the first place.

Here, as the birthplace of the human species, African communities have adapted and evolved over 1000’s of years, without destroying their life support system. Africa needs to reclaim its responsibility and legacy as a basis from which to build a viable future for all.

*************************************

World Environment Day

Malawian farmer
The focus for World Environment Day this year is mitigation of climate change, with the slogan ‘Your Planet Needs You.’ I would like to add to this that ‘We Need Our Planet.’

Whilst it is clearly important that we do all we can to mitigate climate change, I think we also need to think clearly about how we will best support farmers to adapt to some of the worst effects of climate change.

2.5 billion people in developing countries live in rural areas and depend on agriculture both to feed their family and for their livelihood. Now a billion of these people are facing life threatening situations of malnutrition as climate change destroys their crops and render local agricultural knowledge about when to sow and when to plant redundant.

And this situation is only set to get worse. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Fourth Assessment Report 2007) estimates, for example, that food crop yields in some African countries could decline by as much as 50% by 2020.

As I have suggested in a number of posts on this blog, the sustainable farming practices we are supporting poor farmers to employ really are reducing their vulnerability to poor rains. Composting and contour ridge marking, for example, increase the capacity of the soil to hold moisture. Meanwhile seed saving and crop diversification reduce farmer reliance on a single crop, essential given the fact that certain crops are less resistant to extreme weather conditions such as drought.

In fact maybe it’s time to think about the fact that, if we are to feed the world in the future, there are some vital lessons we need to learn ourselves from small scale subsistence farmers. As Tewolde B. G. Egziabher, Director General of the Environmental Protection Authority of Ethiopia said in a speech I posted earlier this week “African subsistence agriculture can become a reference point from which to base sustainable global food production, whilst ensuring it is compatible with the health of the entire biosphere.”

G20 – Building a green economy?

G20 Summit verdict

The Put People First platform of charities, unions and campaign groups of which Find Your Feet is a member, has given its initial reaction the communiqué of the G20 summit.
Glen Tarman of BOND, chair of Put People First, said:

“The G20 appears to have made progress on some critical issues but there are also missed opportunities, especially on building a green economy, and causes for real concern in other areas. G20 leaders have not yet gone far enough on the fundamental changes the world needs.

Our campaign for jobs, justice and climate has clearly made some impact, but three big tests remain:

* Will the G20, the UN and the Copenhagen climate conference do far more to break from the failed policies that brought about the global crisis?

* Will governments agree a comprehensive package of policies that will deliver a new financial architecture and ensure the world emerges from the global recession as a fairer and greener place?

* Where there are positive words today, will they be turned into action tomorrow?

Put People First – and campaigners all around the world – will continue to make the case for change throughout this critical year. Wherever world leaders go to discuss these issues they will hear the voices of ordinary people demanding change.”

On March 28 2009 more than 35,000 people marched through central London under the Put People First banner to demand action for jobs, justice and climate.

G20 Summit verdict
The Put People First platform of charities, unions and campaign groups of which [Your organisation’s name] is a member, has given its initial reaction the communiqué of the G20 summit.
Glen Tarman of BOND, chair of Put People First, said:

“The G20 appears to have made progress on some critical issues but there are also missed opportunities, especially on building a green economy, and causes for real concern in other areas. G20 leaders have not yet gone far enough on the fundamental changes the world needs.

Our campaign for jobs, justice and climate has clearly made some impact, but three big tests remain:

* Will the G20, the UN and the Copenhagen climate conference do far more to break from the failed policies that brought about the global crisis?

* Will governments agree a comprehensive package of policies that will deliver a new financial architecture and ensure the world emerges from the global recession as a fairer and greener place?

* Where there are positive words today, will they be turned into action tomorrow?

Put People First – and campaigners all around the world – will continue to make the case for change throughout this critical year. Wherever world leaders go to discuss these issues they will hear the voices of ordinary people demanding change.”

On March 28 2009 more than 35,000 people marched through central London under the Put People First banner to demand action for jobs, justice and climate.

www.putpeoplefirst.org.uk

World Water Crisis

“Mixed cropping is the best method. Every crop does something to the soil and helps others to grow, either by providing safety against insects or enriching the soil with leaf fall. Further, we feel secure in the thought that if one crop fails there others to sustain us.

The best thing about this method is that our traditional crops are very hardy and can survive under hostile conditions.” Gangwar, a 70 year old woman supported by DDS, India

Professor John Beddington, the Government Chief Scientific Advisor , was on the BBC’s Today programme this morning.

He warned that a “perfect storm” of food shortages, scare water and insufficient energy resources mean that the world is facing imminent major upheavals, with things coming to a head in 2030. He placed a particular emphasis on the problem of water scarcity but remained relatively non committal on certain possible solutions to the crisis, even when John Humphrys pushed him to comment on the fact that GM had not yet delivered on its’ promises and on the need for a revision of our consumption patterns.

Water is, according to UNESCO’s Koichiro Matsuura the “principal medium through which climate change will affect economic, social and environmental conditions. There is an urgent need to strengthen capacity – especially in the poorest countries – to cope with more frequent and intense water-related disasters caused by climate change.”

So, if GM is failing to deliver on its promises, what are the alternatives?

I was pleased to come across an Inter Press Service article today, posted on the Agricultural Biodiversity weblog, about the Deccan Development Society, a partner we worked with for seven years. The article states that in Zaheerabad, dalit (the broken) women forming the lowest rung of India’s stratified society, now demonstrate adaptation to climate change by following a system of interspersing crops that do not need extra water, chemical inputs or pesticides for production.

Adapting to Climate Change

“It has never rained like this before. It has always rained, but before, it was timely. Now it is untimely – it is hot when it used to be cold, and raining when it used to be hot. It is because our practices have changed and we have unbalanced things.

Everywhere is flooded. Crops are destroyed. Now, with the floods everyone is falling ill, there is disease everywhere.”
Dharahin Devi, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh

Visit our website to find out how we are supporting people like Dharahin to adapt to climate change.

Put People First

Find Your Feet is in the platform for ‘Put People First – march for Jobs, Justice and Climate’ a massive mobilisation that will be taking place on 28th March.

This important mobilisation, which will include development agencies, unions, domestic poverty, faith and environmental groups, will be telling world leaders attending the G20 summit – happening just five days afterwards on 2 April – that only just, fair and sustainable policies can lead the world out of recession.

The platform members believe that tinkering at the margins of a broken economy will not get us out of the current overlapping crisis of massive private debt, banking meltdown, rising poverty and unemployment and looming climate chaos. It will therefore outline a number of practical steps that the UK government should take to signal its readiness to lead a process of fundamental change to put people first.

Global injustice and climate change

As Dharahin’s story shows it’s the most vulnerable people who are most affected by climate change. Floods and droughts mean that crops are being destroyed and that local agricultural knowledge about when to sow and when to plant is becoming redundant. Meanwhile the upsurge in malaria and cholera due to increased warming and precipitation means that women are having to spend more time tending to the sick and less time working in their fields.

However developing countries just don’t have the economic resources necessary to finance adaptation. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessment Report says the cost of adaptation to climate change in Africa could be as much as 5 to 10 per cent of the entire continent’s GDP.

One of the key demands of the Put People First platform therefore is that, as a matter of global justice, developed countries commit to “sufficient, substantial, verifiable new resource transfer from North to South, additional to Overseas Development Assistance (ODA), to support resilient adaptation and sustainable development in poor countries.”

Funding adaptation to climate change

Developed nations have generated a number of programmes and instruments to support developing countries adapt to climate change. The 2008 G8 Declaration on Energy Security and Climate Change, for example, commits the leading industrial nations to combating climate change – with the highest emitters and the richest countries contributing the most. (International Institute for Environment and Development)

However G8 countries have so far contributed very limited funding to adaptation in developing countries. In the light of the current financial crisis and given that none of the G8 countries have yet achieved their ODA commitments (0.7% GDP) we need to make it clearer than ever that, if people in developing countries are not going to be steamrollered by climate change, adaptation pledges need to be met.

Which adaptation strategies?

In an interesting article in NI 419 ‘Countdown to Copenhagen – What’s on the table’ Danny Chivers looks at some of the main proposals for dealing with climate change that will be discussed at Copenhagen. In relation to mitigation and adaptation funds he queries the proposal that the wealthiest countries put the climate change support money they’ve been promising for years into a central fund for spending on low-carbon technology, emission reductions and climate change adaptation in the Global South.

“A central fund could take the decision even further away from those affected by it. Will the funds be spent on effective projects such as protecting the land rights of indigenous forest people, or on expensive distractions like nuclear power?”

Meanwhile people in developing countries around the world are already finding ways of coping that are locally relevant and that use inexpensive, appropriate technologies. “This kind of experience, gained at the grassroots, boosts resilience as no top-down initiative can.” (IIED)

Any talks around funding for climate change adaptation therefore need to ensure that an adequate space is created for alternative, community-led ideas and strategies to be heard.

GM Crops – Should we believe in them?

Tales of intimidation

My colleague Olivia recently came back from a rather disturbing GM Freeze talk by Percy Schmeiser.

Percy, is a farmer from Bruno, Saskatchewan in Canada, whose Canola (rape seed) fields were contaminated with Monsanto’s Round-Up Ready Canola. He became involved in a high-profile legal battle with Monsanto, lasting many years, during which time he claims he was subjected to 24-hour surveillance of his house and threatening phonecalls. He also claims that Monsanto bribed his neighbours, tried to enforce gagging orders making him agree never to take Monsanto to court again and employed gene police to encourage neighbours to report on each other.

His story is not, it seems, an isolated case. As a GM Watch ‘quiz’ posted on Food Democracy asks “What is the annual budget that Monsanto devotes to harassing, intimidating, suing – and in some cases bankrupting – American farmers over alleged improper use of its patented seeds? ANSWER: 10 million dollars.”

What is going on?

GM crops are patented crops which means that ownership accrues to the holder of the patent or Intellectual Property Right or ‘breeder’. Seeds used therefore have to be purchased year on year or a royalty payment must be made if seed is recycled. Since most crops entering the market are bred by private companies, ownership accrues to the company holding the patent – normally a small number of large corporations.
As a result “Patents and genetic modification mutually reinforce each other. Patents provide the commercial monopoly that enables companies to control markets and maximise profits.” (GM Freeze)

Since GM crops can never co-exist with non-GM crops of the same species without the risk of contaminating them, the indigenous seeds that farmers have developed over centuries are at risk. Meanwhile farmers with contaminated fields could end up being forced to pay royalties to companies that own the patents on the GM crops that contaminated their fields.

Food crisis – opportunity or challenge?

As Daniel Howden , the Africa Correspondent for the Independent, writes in his article Hope for Africa lies in political reforms the climate crisis was used to boost biofuels, helping to create the food crisis; and now the food crisis is being used to revive the fortunes of the GM industry.”

However the food crisis also presents us with an opportunity to highlight alternatives to the proposed GM ‘solutions,’ especially given the fact that climate change is one of the major factors contributing to the food crisis.

For years African farmers, in the face of inherently unreliable climatic patterns, have made use of different agrecological niches by choosing wetlands and drylands, different soil types and planting cereals, grain legumes and root crops often in the same fields on the understanding that not all crops were likely to fail simultaneously. This diversification of agricultural production minimizes their risk in the face of challenges such as climate change.

FYF empowers Malawian farmers to make sure that these farming skills aren’t lost. By taking control of their farming operation (including by seed-saving from one year to the next) and making sure that their voices are heard at a national level the farmers we work with being empowered to act as ‘Citizens’ in their society. Read more about how we are empowering Farmers as Citizens

Over the coming years this could prove particularly important. As John Vidal writes in the New Statesman Monsanto espies huge profits in places such as Malawi, where the whole country depends on maize. It’s not legal to sell GM there but even if it were, the chances of…small farmers, 90 per cent of the population, benefiting from it are utterly remote. Malawi is a land of conservative, uneducated and vulnerable farmers. They could not possibly afford the seeds or the herbicide, let alone take the risk. It would be criminal to ask them to.”